Existence is.
That said, one may misunderstand this self-reflective concept in the sense of there being a potentially paradoxical lack in it's semantic substance which requires more fully examined previously held beliefs and / or attitudes re levels of truth and / or comprehensibility vis-à-vis any reality index applicable. That is to say, it’s veracity may fail to register substantially on one’s hypothetical truth-meter, meaning-meter, or whatnot. In other words, concerning absolutism vs. relativity, or symbolic vs. practical truth, or any existential topic consisting of ultimate polarities (i.e., any reasonable facsimile topic thereto) there inevitably remains a certain uncertainty re such a topic’s logical meaning and / or relevance in any practical sense.
Still, in spite of it’s tautologicality (i.e., all philosophical platitudes aside), and notwithstanding it’s overly inclusive and specious symbolic literary units (to again reference the ironically obfuscatory nature of it’s literality), it may, indeed, after all, when all is said and done, be conceivably considered (without fear of self-contradiction) to be more or less a rationally “correct” and mystically “meaningful” assertion!
Norm Breyfogle
July 2003
BIOGRAPHY 
